Regional Labor Office overturns Amazon union vote in Alabama
A regional office of the National Labor Relations Board ordered a new union election at an Amazon warehouse in Alabama on Monday, upholding a union challenge to a vote that the company had won decisively. The decision was widely expected after a hearing officer recommended in August that the results had to be thrown out and a new election takes place.
After the August decision, Amazon declared that it intended to appeal to the labor board in Washington if it did not prevail at the regional level, but it did not say Monday whether it would follow through. Nearly half of the 6,000 eligible workers at the warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama cast their ballots by mail in February and March on whether they wanted to join the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. The tally against the unionization bid was two to one.
The union filed an objection to this vote after the results were announced in April and argued that Amazon had undermined the conditions for a fair election by pressing the Postal Service to install a collection box at the warehouse, among other complaints. The union also argued that the box was not authorized by the labor board and it created the impression that Amazon was monitoring which of the workers voted.
Source: The New York Times
After the August decision, Amazon declared that it intended to appeal to the labor board in Washington if it did not prevail at the regional level, but it did not say Monday whether it would follow through. Nearly half of the 6,000 eligible workers at the warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama cast their ballots by mail in February and March on whether they wanted to join the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. The tally against the unionization bid was two to one.
The union filed an objection to this vote after the results were announced in April and argued that Amazon had undermined the conditions for a fair election by pressing the Postal Service to install a collection box at the warehouse, among other complaints. The union also argued that the box was not authorized by the labor board and it created the impression that Amazon was monitoring which of the workers voted.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Hiring
Employee Relations
Gender Identity
Networking
Salary Surveys
Technology
Employment Offers
Fiduciary Duty
Organizational &
Workplace Wellness
Affirmative Action
Electronic Records Management
Retaliation
Raise
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Employee Conduct
Workplace Harassment
HR Careers
Analytical Aptitude
Workforce Planning
Employee Resource Groups
Inclusion, Equity &
Disaster Preparation & Response
Talent Acquisition
Paid Leave
Recruiting
Health Savings Accounts
Disability Accomodations
Workplace Security
Privacy
Benefits Compliance
Artificial Intelligence
Unemployment Benefits
Disability Benefits
Sexual Orientation
Opening & Closing
Business Acumen
Global Mindset
Retirement & Recognitions
Contemporary Issues
Workplance Violence
Parental Leave
Discrimination
Payroll
Work Visas
Mentoring & Coaching
Religious Accomodations
Downsizing
Workers' Compensation
Onboarding
Tags
Article
Effective Ways to Stay Productive While Telecommuting
Remote working is not a new thing in the US but a lifesaver in the current situation when social di ...
Is It Time For Recruiters To Think Like Marketers?
About 46% of recruiters acknowledge this by seeing recruitment more as marketing than an expansion ...
Tips for Staffing Agencies to Create a Competitive Advantage
Today, it is a $174 Billion industry and one of the leading B2B businesses in the US. Whenever HR p ...
The Interviewer's Guide to Conducting Phone Interviews
The job market in the US is slowly gaining traction after the long period of gloom that took the un ...
Comments