Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Disability Benefits
Age
Opening
Talent Acquisition
Consultation
HR Careers
Employee Relations
Opening & Closing
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Job Applications &
Contracts & RFPs
Raise
Business Acumen
Contemporary Issues
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Vendors & Software
Firing
Open Enrollment
Employment Contracts
Global Mindset
Workforce Planning
Employee Resource Groups
Disability Accomodations
Time Worked
Environmental Health Hazards
Cybersecurity
Benefits Compliance
Employment Offers
Termination
Technology
Substance Abuse
Mental Wellness
Electronic Records Management
Employee Handbooks
Payroll
Dependent Benefits
Family & Medical Leave
Sexual Orientation
Workers' Compensation
Investigations
Communicable Diseases
Retirement Benefits
Networking
Health Care Benefits
Employment Testing
Overtime Eligibility &
Executive Compensation
Employment Law & Compliance
Benefits
Performance Management
Tags
Article
Financial steps to consider before quitting your job
Americans live paycheck to paycheck, making it difficult to leave their current employer. All thing ...
The Unionization Wave
From the peak of the pandemic in 2020 through the Great Resignation wave, unionization has been a ...
Tips To Help You Create A Robust Hiring Strategy For 2021
While employment is steadily rising in all sectors, the fear of COVID-19 still reigns supreme. As t ...
Let's Talk about the Hustle Economy
With the COVID-19 outbreak, it has increased manifold, owing to the rise in remote working. It’s be ...
Comments