Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Payroll
Mental Wellness
Religion & Spirituality
Contracts & RFPs
Remote & Hybrid Work
Bonuses & Incentives
Talent Acquisition
Unemployment Benefits
Contemporary Issues
Performance Management
Global Mindset
Teamwork
People Management
Employee Handbooks
Organizational Structure
Emergency Response
Disability Accomodations
Severance Pay
Employee Resource Groups
Benefits Compliance
Workplace Wellness
Employment Contracts
Onboarding
Mentoring & Coaching
Whistleblowing
Pay Equity
Succession Planning
Employee Surveys
Hiring & Firing
Employee Conduct
Workplace Security
Work Life Integration
Data Security
Intellectual Property
Networking
Career Development
Investigations
Health Care Benefits
Health Savings Accounts
Open Enrollment
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Environmental Health Hazards
Age
Religious Accomodations
Electronic Records Management
Analytical Aptitude
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Employment Testing
Vendors & Software
Hiring
Tags
Article
How to Cope with America’s Return-To-Office Plans
If you’re looking forward to shifting from remote to in-office work, here are a few ways to cope wi ...
The Future of Gig Employment
There’s no denying that the gig economy has seen much growth since the last recession. With the spr ...
Is It Time For Recruiters To Think Like Marketers?
About 46% of recruiters acknowledge this by seeing recruitment more as marketing than an expansion ...
Effective Ways to Stay Productive While Telecommuting
Remote working is not a new thing in the US but a lifesaver in the current situation when social di ...
Comments