Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Fiduciary Duty
Remote & Hybrid Work
Environmental Health Hazards
Employee Surveys
Talent Acquisition
Workplace Security
Emergency Response
Intellectual Property
Leadership Development
Overtime Eligibility &
Open Enrollment
Retaliation
Risk Management
Termination
Analytical Aptitude
Leadership &
Wellness Benefits
Ethnicity
Affirmative Action
Religious Accomodations
Retention
Firing
Contemporary Issues
Global Mindset
Employment Contracts
Mental Wellness
Benefits
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Hiring & Firing
Contracts & RFPs
Retirement Benefits
Labor Relations
Policies & Practices
Data Security
Business Continuity
Privacy
Work Life Integration
Employee Conduct
Workforce Planning
Health Savings Accounts
Flexible Spending Account
Downsizing
Job Applications &
Succession Planning
Workplace Stories
Workplace Culture
Overtime Pay
Inclusion, Equity &
Disability Accomodations
Mentoring & Coaching
Tags
Article
Tips To Help You Create A Robust Hiring Strategy For 2021
While employment is steadily rising in all sectors, the fear of COVID-19 still reigns supreme. As t ...
Are 4 day work weeks the future?
Robert Owen, a Welsh textile mill owner, social reformer, and labor activist came up with a slogan ...
25+ Hiring Strategies To Help You Source Talented Candidates
Companies have resorted to digital hiring processes to ensure health, safety, and convenience to jo ...
I-9 Compliance for Remote Employees - A Guide for Companies
More than 50% of the US workforce is working remotely as of now. According to experts, about 25-30% ...
Comments