Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Electronic Records Management
Workforce Planning
Disaster Preparation & Response
Job Applications &
Data Security
Business Continuity
Retirement Benefits
Workplace Wellness
Leadership &
Paid Leave
Campus Placement
Consultation
Succession Planning
Raise
Opening & Closing
Relationship Management
Firing
Religion & Spirituality
Ethnicity
Leave Management
HR Software
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Organizational Structure
Sexualy Harassment
Flexible Spending Account
Pay Equity
Educational Assistance
Cybersecurity
Whistleblowing
Workers' Compensation
Hiring
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Retirement & Recognitions
Work Life Integration
Ethical Practice
Sexual Orientation
Discrimination
Bonuses & Incentives
HR Careers
Substance Abuse
Talent Acquisition
People Management
Inclusion, Equity &
Global Mindset
Teamwork
Mentoring & Coaching
Change Management
Organization & Employee Development
Disability Benefits
Communication
Tags
Article
Millennials Care About These 8 Things at Their Workplace - Are Your Offering Those?
Millennials are considered to be social people, who live by the ‘work hard play hard’ mantra and ar ...
Top 5 Challenges of HR Professionals During COVID-19 Pandemic
When it comes to the talks of the unemployment rate due to COVID-19, experts compare it to the Grea ...
All you need to know about the teaching profession
Teaching jobs: transformative teacher roles you can undertake amidst the teacher shortage in the US ...
Gig Economy and Its Impact on Staffing Firms
With over 20.5 million US workers losing their jobs in April 2020 during the national lockdown, man ...
Comments