Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Mental Wellness
Dependent Benefits
Employee Relations
Business Continuity
Recruiting
Investigations
Affirmative Action
Leadership Development
Whistleblowing
Data Security
Firing
Promotion
Employee Resource Groups
Privacy
Opening
Teamwork
Business Acumen
Unemployment Benefits
Workplace Wellness
HR Careers
Benefits
Job Applications &
Social Media
Intellectual Property
Overtime Pay
Paid Leave
Talent Acquisition
Mentoring & Coaching
Job Descriptions
Parental Leave
Fiduciary Duty
Payroll
Salary Surveys
Compensation & Benefits
Networking
Environmental Health Hazards
Onboarding
Employee Conduct
Retaliation
Records & Reports
Emergency Response
Artificial Intelligence
Labor Relations
Employee Surveys
Leave Management
Ethnicity
Disability Benefits
Disaster Preparation & Response
Workers' Compensation
Sexualy Harassment
Tags
Article
Why Work With Staffing Agencies To Hire Your Temporary Workers
Recruitment is getting more challenging day by day. Layers of complexities have emerged with the pa ...
7 Signs That Tell You It’s Time to Quit Your Current Job
Last year, about 4,478,000 workers, which is approximately 3% of the workforce in the US (besides t ...
Top paying Careers in 2021
The economy may be taking its time with recovery, but hiring and job hunting are at an all-time hig ...
What Why and How of Background Checks A Useful Guide for Staffing Agencies
Background checks are one of the pre-employment requisites to prevent bad hires. About 96% of emplo ...
Comments