Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Educational Assistance
Overtime Eligibility &
Workplace Stories
Gender Identity
Firing
Benefits
Bonuses & Incentives
HR Careers
Business Acumen
Global Mindset
Opening
Talent Acquisition
Workforce Planning
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Electronic Records Management
Environmental Health Hazards
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Mental Health Benefits
Retaliation
Dependent Benefits
Wellness Benefits
Leave Management
Technology
Relationship Management
Affirmative Action
Cybersecurity
Background Checks
Retirement Benefits
Opening & Closing
Remote & Hybrid Work
Promotion
Job Descriptions
Learning & Development
Whistleblowing
Salary Surveys
Workplace Harassment
Communicable Diseases
Communication
Pay Equity
Hiring & Firing
Closing
Data Security
Recruiting
Hiring
Employment Offers
Benefits Compliance
Teamwork
Employee Relations
Analytical Aptitude
Leadership &
Tags
Article
Tips To Help You Create A Robust Hiring Strategy For 2021
While employment is steadily rising in all sectors, the fear of COVID-19 still reigns supreme. As t ...
Is It Time For Recruiters To Think Like Marketers?
About 46% of recruiters acknowledge this by seeing recruitment more as marketing than an expansion ...
Tips for Staffing Agencies to Create a Competitive Advantage
Today, it is a $174 Billion industry and one of the leading B2B businesses in the US. Whenever HR p ...
Nursing Job Openings
It’s no secret that the healthcare sector has been reigning in all its powers over the years, parti ...
Comments