Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Disaster Preparation & Response
Workplace Stories
Open Enrollment
Wellness Benefits
Inclusion, Equity &
Mental Health Benefits
Sexualy Harassment
Consultation
Age
Whistleblowing
Contemporary Issues
People Management
Benefits Compliance
Remote & Hybrid Work
Severance Pay
Workplace Harassment
Hiring
Change Management
Unemployment Benefits
Analytical Aptitude
HR Careers
Pay Equity
Retaliation
Policies & Practices
Employee Data Privacy
Flexible Spending Account
Overtime Eligibility &
Affirmative Action
Leadership Development
Business Acumen
HR Software
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Organizational Structure
Employee Engagement
Employee Handbooks
Ethnicity
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Salary Surveys
Workplace Security
Discrimination
Mental Wellness
Social Media
Contracts & RFPs
Hiring & Firing
Retirement & Recognitions
Educational Assistance
Retirement Benefits
Workers' Compensation
Disability Benefits
Employment Offers
Tags
Article
Know the Work Habits of Highly Effective Employees
The employees are the most valuable assets of any organization. It’s their credibility, efficiency, ...
Avoid These 5 (Obvious) Mistakes in Your Job Application
Today’s market is a competitive one – especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Unlike 2019, when the ...
This Thanksgiving - Give Thanks To All These People
This Thanksgiving is going to be different, no doubt! But it need not be different in a negative se ...
Top 5 Challenges of HR Professionals During COVID-19 Pandemic
When it comes to the talks of the unemployment rate due to COVID-19, experts compare it to the Grea ...
Comments