Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Workplace Harassment
Disaster Preparation & Response
Work Life Integration
Overtime Pay
Talent Acquisition
Inclusion, Equity &
Learning & Development
Closing
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Severance Pay
Performance Management
Employee Surveys
Consultation
Family & Medical Leave
Artificial Intelligence
Business Continuity
Workforce Planning
Communicable Diseases
Fiduciary Duty
Electronic Records Management
Intellectual Property
Overtime Eligibility &
Background Checks
Educational Assistance
Workplace Security
Employment Contracts
Hiring
Employee Data Privacy
Employment Testing
Disability Accomodations
Employment Offers
Organizational Structure
Executive Compensation
Emergency Response
Whistleblowing
Employee Engagement
Networking
Organizational &
Wellness Benefits
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Parental Leave
Workplace Wellness
Onboarding
Pay Equity
Workplance Violence
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Compensation & Benefits
Gender Identity
Career Development
Disability Benefits
Tags
Article
How to Avoid Burnout in 2022
Whatever your work setting may be, it’s important to stay productive while you don’t burn out. Here ...
What Are the Costs to Consider While Planning A Recruitment Budget?
If your organization is on a hiring spree too, one of the key things to consider is the recruitment ...
Tips for Staffing Agencies to Create a Competitive Advantage
Today, it is a $174 Billion industry and one of the leading B2B businesses in the US. Whenever HR p ...
How Startups Can Ensure Success While Working With Freelancers
However, the scenario has changed drastically in the last ten years. According to a report by Forbe ...
Comments