Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Mental Health Benefits
Overtime Eligibility &
Parental Leave
Workplace Wellness
Open Enrollment
Health Savings Accounts
Mental Wellness
Job Descriptions
Relationship Management
Electronic Records Management
Employee Data Privacy
Termination
Age
Labor Relations
Religion & Spirituality
Vendors & Software
Dependent Benefits
Inclusion, Equity &
Opening & Closing
Recruiting
Retention
What it is like to work in?
Ethnicity
HR Careers
Communication
Religious Accomodations
Organization & Employee Development
Learning & Development
Risk Management
Closing
Intellectual Property
Business Acumen
Benefits
Disaster Preparation & Response
Unemployment Benefits
Remote & Hybrid Work
Firing
Leave Management
Investigations
Wellness Benefits
Employment Testing
Hiring & Firing
Sexualy Harassment
Bonuses & Incentives
Do's & Don'ts
Retirement Benefits
Analytical Aptitude
Onboarding
Organizational Structure
Contemporary Issues
Tags
Article
These Companies Are On Holiday Hiring Spree-Are You Ready?
The current unemployment rate in the US stands at 6.7%, which is almost double the rate in February ...
Know the Work Habits of Highly Effective Employees
The employees are the most valuable assets of any organization. It’s their credibility, efficiency, ...
Here Is How to Answer These 5 Tricky HR Questions
During an interview, you’re not only asked questions according to your credibility and qualificatio ...
How to Avoid Burnout in 2022
Whatever your work setting may be, it’s important to stay productive while you don’t burn out. Here ...
Comments