Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Recruiting
Campus Placement
Job Descriptions
Inclusion, Equity &
Retaliation
Ethnicity
Global Mindset
Cybersecurity
Workplace Stories
People Management
Consultation
Age
Promotion
Workforce Planning
Unemployment Benefits
Job Applications &
Disability Benefits
Overtime Pay
Affirmative Action
Mental Health Benefits
Time Worked
Data Security
Career Development
Overtime Eligibility &
Risk Management
Analytical Aptitude
Discrimination
Organizational Structure
Employee Conduct
Learning & Development
HR Careers
Paid Leave
Employee Relations
Leadership &
Mentoring & Coaching
Succession Planning
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Raise
HR Software
Benefits Compliance
Pay Equity
Records & Reports
Gender Identity
Communication
Bonuses & Incentives
Wellness Benefits
Educational Assistance
Hiring
Whistleblowing
Fiduciary Duty
Tags
Article
With Manufacturing Jobs Returning to America, What Does It Mean for Manufacturing Job Seekers?
Reshoring is on its way for the US, due to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, especially for the tech man ...
A Quick Look at The Great Resignation
The Great Resignation, as experts call it, is a rather fitting term for a phenomenon where millions ...
What Are the Costs to Consider While Planning A Recruitment Budget?
If your organization is on a hiring spree too, one of the key things to consider is the recruitment ...
How Startups Can Ensure Success While Working With Freelancers
However, the scenario has changed drastically in the last ten years. According to a report by Forbe ...
Comments