Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Intellectual Property
Hiring & Firing
Health Savings Accounts
Unemployment Benefits
Business Acumen
Environmental Health Hazards
Retirement Benefits
Mental Health Benefits
Religious Accomodations
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Open Enrollment
Electronic Records Management
Employee Resource Groups
Pay Equity
Contemporary Issues
Disability Benefits
Fiduciary Duty
Privacy
Executive Compensation
Disaster Preparation & Response
Parental Leave
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Employment Branding
Dependent Benefits
Networking
Job Descriptions
Workers' Compensation
Opening & Closing
Workplance Violence
Family & Medical Leave
Organizational Structure
Overtime Eligibility &
Employee Data Privacy
Affirmative Action
Vendors & Software
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Job Applications &
Career Development
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Mentoring & Coaching
Hiring
Performance Management
Workplace Wellness
Employee Engagement
Retention
Employee Conduct
Overtime Pay
Age
Talent Acquisition
Employment Offers
Tags
Article
A Guide for HR Professionals to Ensure Diversity and Inclusivity at Workplace
One of the key responsibilities of HR teams is to ensure a diverse workplace and manage it effectiv ...
Are 4 day work weeks the future?
Robert Owen, a Welsh textile mill owner, social reformer, and labor activist came up with a slogan ...
I-9 Compliance for Remote Employees - A Guide for Companies
More than 50% of the US workforce is working remotely as of now. According to experts, about 25-30% ...
A complete breakdown of the US Commercial Drivers Licenses
In the United States of America to operate any type of large automobile, you need a license. This i ...
Comments