Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Global Mindset
Contracts & RFPs
Wellness Benefits
Workplace Culture
Leadership &
Severance Pay
Dependent Benefits
HR Careers
Communicable Diseases
Social Media
Disability Benefits
Flexible Spending Account
Executive Compensation
Benefits
Opening
Disaster Preparation & Response
Career Development
Substance Abuse
Workplace Security
Workforce Planning
Change Management
Employee Engagement
Ethical Practice
Leadership Development
Performance Management
Workplace Stories
Networking
Educational Assistance
Opening & Closing
Employment Branding
Consultation
Employee Surveys
Bonuses & Incentives
Overtime Eligibility &
Employment Testing
Open Enrollment
Labor Relations
Succession Planning
Retirement Benefits
Disability Accomodations
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Unemployment Benefits
Risk Management
Health Care Benefits
Age
Promotion
Contemporary Issues
Vendors & Software
Technology
Termination
Tags
Article
The Interviewer's Guide to Conducting Phone Interviews
The job market in the US is slowly gaining traction after the long period of gloom that took the un ...
Effective Ways to Stay Productive While Telecommuting
Remote working is not a new thing in the US but a lifesaver in the current situation when social di ...
Why Work With Staffing Agencies To Hire Your Temporary Workers
Recruitment is getting more challenging day by day. Layers of complexities have emerged with the pa ...
Nursing Job Openings
It’s no secret that the healthcare sector has been reigning in all its powers over the years, parti ...
Comments