Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Firing
Mental Wellness
Religious Accomodations
Overtime Eligibility &
Performance Management
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Compensation & Benefits
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Cybersecurity
Opening & Closing
Employment Branding
Social Media
Benefits Compliance
Disability Accomodations
Employment Testing
Promotion
Workers' Compensation
Teamwork
Talent Acquisition
Dependent Benefits
Risk Management
Educational Assistance
Data Security
Disability Benefits
Job Applications &
Workplace Wellness
Intellectual Property
Leadership Development
Employee Resource Groups
Benefits
Leadership &
Communicable Diseases
Overtime Pay
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Open Enrollment
Severance Pay
Communication
Employee Relations
Workplace Harassment
Learning & Development
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Raise
Retention
Affirmative Action
Flexible Spending Account
Mental Health Benefits
Hiring & Firing
Business Continuity
Background Checks
Employment Contracts
Tags
Article
How Startups Can Ensure Success While Working With Freelancers
However, the scenario has changed drastically in the last ten years. According to a report by Forbe ...
The Unionization Wave
From the peak of the pandemic in 2020 through the Great Resignation wave, unionization has been a ...
With Manufacturing Jobs Returning to America, What Does It Mean for Manufacturing Job Seekers?
Reshoring is on its way for the US, due to the ongoing COVID-19 crisis, especially for the tech man ...
Driver Jobs to Watch Out For
If you love being on the road, if you love driving with the wind rushing through your hair, if your ...
Comments