Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Global Mindset
Disability Accomodations
Mentoring & Coaching
Time Worked
Affirmative Action
Analytical Aptitude
Retirement & Recognitions
Job Applications &
Mental Wellness
Leadership &
Hiring & Firing
Health Savings Accounts
Promotion
Employee Surveys
Work Visas
Fiduciary Duty
Performance Management
Ethical Practice
Workplace Wellness
Employment Testing
Workplace Security
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Business Continuity
Flexible Spending Account
Open Enrollment
Closing
Opening
Records & Reports
Workplance Violence
People Management
Teamwork
Electronic Records Management
Disaster Preparation & Response
Gender Identity
Employment Offers
Hiring
Parental Leave
Ethnicity
Communicable Diseases
Cybersecurity
Employment Contracts
Wellness Benefits
Disability Benefits
Benefits
Investigations
Background Checks
Artificial Intelligence
Employee Relations
Mental Health Benefits
Employee Conduct
Tags
Article
A complete breakdown of the US Commercial Drivers Licenses
In the United States of America to operate any type of large automobile, you need a license. This i ...
Here Is How to Answer These 5 Tricky HR Questions
During an interview, you’re not only asked questions according to your credibility and qualificatio ...
Return to Office: Tips to cope with Change
The past two years have been a roller coaster ride, we’ve all acclimatized ourselves with the work ...
A Guide for HR Professionals to Ensure Diversity and Inclusivity at Workplace
One of the key responsibilities of HR teams is to ensure a diverse workplace and manage it effectiv ...
Comments