Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Benefits Compliance
Health Savings Accounts
Religious Accomodations
Affirmative Action
Mentoring & Coaching
Organizational &
Closing
Campus Placement
Overtime Pay
Severance Pay
Contemporary Issues
Retention
Salary Surveys
Employee Resource Groups
Gender Identity
Employee Data Privacy
Business Acumen
Open Enrollment
Performance Management
Pay Equity
Intellectual Property
Termination
Electronic Records Management
Drug & Alcohol Testing
Leadership Development
Policies & Practices
Networking
Employee Relations
Disability Benefits
Change Management
Parental Leave
Whistleblowing
Contracts & RFPs
Succession Planning
Time Worked
Opening & Closing
Workforce Planning
Recruiting
Privacy
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Dependent Benefits
Discrimination
Onboarding
Workplace Culture
Emergency Response
Employment Contracts
Sexual Orientation
Ethnicity
Flexible Spending Account
Disability Accomodations
Tags
Article
Tips to Write Job Descriptions That Will Attract the Best Candidates
Just as the candidates need the right jobs to secure their future, the companies also need the righ ...
Gig Economy and Its Impact on Staffing Firms
With over 20.5 million US workers losing their jobs in April 2020 during the national lockdown, man ...
Return to Office: Tips to cope with Change
The past two years have been a roller coaster ride, we’ve all acclimatized ourselves with the work ...
Top 5 Challenges of HR Professionals During COVID-19 Pandemic
When it comes to the talks of the unemployment rate due to COVID-19, experts compare it to the Grea ...
Comments