Labor Board seeks unionization at Starbucks after lost election
The National Labor Relations Board seeks to order Starbucks to recognize a union at the Buffalo-area store where the union had lost an initial vote last year. This move is part of a larger effort by the labor board to scrutinize Starbucks' response to a nationwide union campaign.
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
In a complaint against the company on Thursday, the agency accused Starbucks of intimidating and retaliating against workers seeking to unionize. It might seem "aggressive" for the board to order the company to bargain at a store where the union didn’t win. But, Matthew Bodie, a former labor board lawyer says it is, within the normal range of remedies for such cases. He added, "The complaint sends a message."
Since December, workers at more than 70 Starbucks stores have voted to unionize and they have filed petitions to hold union elections at more than 150 additional cafes. Meanwhile, the regional office monitoring Buffalo issued a complaint two weeks ago accusing Starbucks of firing employees because they supported a union. The company has also been accused of promising benefits to employees as a way to discourage them from unionizing and intimidating workers who sought to unionize by subjecting them to surveillance and other illegal behavior.
Source: The New York Times
Category
Workplance Violence
Risk Management
Retirement & Recognitions
Eligibility Verification (I-9)
Workplace Security
Background Checks
Pay Equity
Organizational Structure
Organization & Employee Development
Family & Medical Leave
Workforce Planning
Teamwork
Ethnicity
Communication
Workplace Culture
Wellness Benefits
Salary Surveys
Inclusion, Equity & Diversity
Paid Leave
Benefits
Job Descriptions
Disaster Preparation & Response
Inclusion, Equity &
Closing
Discrimination
Analytical Aptitude
Contracts & RFPs
Environmental Health Hazards
Firing
Organizational &
Termination
Severance Pay
Policies & Practices
Retaliation
Time Worked
Retirement Benefits
Gender Identity
Relationship Management
Executive Compensation
Bonuses & Incentives
Business Continuity
Employment Branding
Educational Assistance
Leave Management
Benefits Reporting & Disclosure
Disability Accomodations
Privacy
Retention
Employment Offers
Opening
Tags
Article
Let's Talk about the Hustle Economy
With the COVID-19 outbreak, it has increased manifold, owing to the rise in remote working. It’s be ...
How Startups Can Ensure Success While Working With Freelancers
However, the scenario has changed drastically in the last ten years. According to a report by Forbe ...
The Interviewer's Guide to Conducting Phone Interviews
The job market in the US is slowly gaining traction after the long period of gloom that took the un ...
Did You Lose Your Job During COVID-19? Here’s What to Do
First of all, know that you’re not alone in this. About 20.6 million Americans have lost their jobs ...
Comments